Mel Gibson’s theory: LA wildfires ‘commissioned’ to clear land

Online commenters claim that Academy Award-winning actor Mel Gibson is “losing his marbles” for implying that the tragic fire was “commissioned” to evict people from valuable land after the wildfires in Los Angeles destroyed his California house.

Thousands of people in Los Angeles have been devastated and heartbroken by the recent Palisades fire.

 

According to the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection, since they started on January 7, the wildfires in California have burned over 40,660 acres, damaged about 12,500 buildings, and claimed the lives of at least 24 people.

Actor Mel Gibson is among those who have been severely affected. On January 10, while filming an episode of Joe Rogan’s podcast, Gibson discovered that the fire had destroyed his $23.5 million Malibu mansion.

 

Since then, the Braveheart star has talked with Fox anchor Laura Ingraham about his views and experience around the tragedy.

“Passports and a few paperwork were among the three items my kid stole and removed, but they are all fine.”But,” Gibson told Fox News, “it’s tragic, it makes you really sad.”

 

He lost valuable artwork, rare literature from the 1600s, and photographs, among other things. Gibson characterized the tragedy as “purification” while considering these priceless assets.

The house and belongings they lost in the fire were merely “things,” which “may or may not be replaceable but they’re only things,” the speaker said, describing the experience as “a strange mixture of sadness and almost kind of an elation.”

 

The Mad Max star then likened the devastating devastation of his property to the World War II bombing of Dresden, a German city that was destroyed.

“I just kind of look at it almost in a weird kind of way as purification,” he continues, “and we’re still here.”

Secret plans

The 69-year-old actor asked whether foul play was a factor in the terrible fire that destroyed hundreds of homes, including his own, and shared his ideas on it during his visit on the show.

“I am aware that, for whatever reason, they were tampering with the water and releasing reserves. That’s what they’ve been doing for some time.The actor hinted at a potential covert goal, saying, “California has a lot of problems that sort of baffle the mind as far as why they do things.”

Gibson’s theory is based on his suspicion that the wildfire may have been started on purpose for political or financial gain by certain influential people or organizations.

Gibson tells the host, “I can make all kinds of horrible theories up in my head, conspiracy theories and everything,” implying that the fires were “commissioned” and purposefully started. Additionally, that there exist persons who are willing, able, and ready to ignite fires, and that the wind conditions were favorable.

Later, the star of Lethal Weapon asked whether the purported fire starters were “commissioned” or “just acting on their own volition.”

According to Gibson, it’s “fact.”

“Is it on purpose, which is an insane thing to think?” Gibson asked Ingraham, quickly outlining his “insane” theory. The question of whether a purpose is being considered arises. What might it be? What do they want, you know? Is the state deserted? I’m not sure.

 

 

“And obviously there’s a great need for high density housing in California and across the country,” the presenter said, playing the bait. The climate folks are pushing hard for that.

“And you’re already hearing rumblings of that,” she continues. Goodbye single-family dwellings in this instance. Hi there, densely populated housing!

Gibson referred to “cattle barons,” a word from the 19th century used to characterize wealthy landowners who cleared the land for ranching, after stating that it’s a “pretty scary” thought.

It makes me think of the old cattle barons who cleared country of people. I’m not sure.The lack of water merely felt a little more handy.

“The wind conditions and the availability of individuals who were willing, able, and ready to start fires.” And are they operating voluntarily or are they under a commission to do so?

“Truthful words”

Reactions to Gibson’s remarks have been divided, as was to be expected. On social media, some admirers praised him for his courage in voicing what they see as underreported facts.

In the Fox clip’s comments section, one netizen remarks, “He has the guts to tell the truth.” Another comments, “Magnificent words of TRUTH from Mel Gibson – AGAIN!!!” in support of the actor’s assertions.

“Mel is one of the very few courageous entertainers with morals, conscience, that speaks truths others dare not,” a third says, praising the celebrity as a truth speaker. “Mel, keep kicking the system in the guts! The world needs to hear the truth!” comments another.

“Zombie conspiracy”

Critics have swiftly characterized his assertions as irrational and reckless, with some arguing that he has overreached himself.

“Very insane. Spreading conspiracy theories about such a terrible event is not the right thing to do right now. One angry internet user says, “I’m not even sure if any time is really appropriate, people losing homes and lives, is a time for compassion, not a time for conspiracies.”

 

“What crazy does is insane! A second says, “Go get it, Mel. You’ve needed it for a long time.” A third writes, “He should get help…” in agreement with that sentiment.so sick of these zombie conspiracy theorists.

Someone another remarks, “Dang. The homeboy is going crazy.

Please be aware that conspiracy theories are unsupported by any proof.

Please share this story with us so we can get your thoughts on Mel Gibson’s suggestion that the fires were intentionally sparked.

Rate article